auspol, aps, freedom of speech, etc 

reading through the high court judgement handed down (the "freedom of speech" one) and it seems extremely even handed in its reasoning, rational, and understandable

i really wish that journalists would report these issues more faithfully instead of writing up ragebait for leftists. i can't understand how anyone could read through the judgement and think that there was any way that the defendant was in the right here

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Café de Auspol - part of the Mastodon social network - Australian Politics - Watch out for spills!